February 2, 2008

Michigan CCW Record proves concealed carry will not create wild west shoot outs.

From: CCRKBA Alerts [Add to Address Book]
Subject: Michigan CCW Record Proves Anti-Gunners Lied...Again, Says CCRKBA

NEWS RELEASE

MICHIGAN CCW RECORD PROVES ANTI-GUNNERS LIED...AGAIN, SAYS CCRKBA

BELLEVUE,WA – After six years of expanded concealed carry in Michigan, the record speaks for itself: No shootouts at traffic stops, a decline in firearms deaths and suicides, and violent crime is down. Concealed carry works, and the hysteria pandered by anti-gun extremists who opposed the law has been proven false.

“Michigan’s armed private citizens have provided the evidence we knew would come,” said Alan Gottlieb, chairman of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. “Lawful concealed carry reduces crime and does not result in mass mayhem as the anti-self-defense crowd wanted us believe. Six years ago, they pulled out
all the stops, fabricated every dire prediction they could imagine, and essentially told lies about concealed carry and passed them off as truth, and too many in the media ate it up as if it were manna from Heaven.”

A recent story in the Detroit Free Press revealed that “the incidence of violent crime in Michigan in the six years since the law went into effect has been, on average, below the rate of the previous six years. The overall incidence of death from firearms, including suicide and accidents, also has declined.”

“Anti-gun rights extremists established a track record for prevarication in state after state where they rabidly fought right-to-carry statutes,” observed CCRKBA Executive Director Mark A. Taff, “and in case after case, including Michigan, every one of their claims has been statistically refuted.”

The newspaper quoted Woodhaven Police Chief Michael Martin, with the Michigan Association of Chiefs of Police, who admitted that police fears about passage of concealed carry were misplaced.

“Law enforcement has nothing to fear from legally-armed, law-abiding citizens,” Gottlieb said. “Their concerns were wrongly placed, and now Michigan lawmen and women know what their colleagues in other states have learned. Armed citizens make a difference, and in many cases are the true first responders. Their presence can
act as a deterrent.

“The experience in Michigan is like the experience in Texas, Ohio, Florida and other states, and it begs the question, if anti-gun extremists were so dishonest about this, what else have they been lying about?”


Please e-mail, distribute, and circulate to friends and family

Copyright © 2008 Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, All Rights
Reserved.

Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms
James Madison Building
12500 N.E. Tenth Place
Bellevue, WA 98005Voice: 425-454-4911
Toll Free: 800-426-4302
FAX: 425-451-3959
email: InformationRequest@ccrkba.org

1/8/2008

More Reasons to Advocate Gun Control

Stupid me ! How could I have limited myself to just one form of gun control for Hollywood activists.. I forgot to consider the content we would have to ban in the films they made.

We should also ban them from making any films where firearms are present. ( including paint ball guns, rubber band guns and the like ).

Furthermore, we should also restrict their filming of anything which might be construed to be a firearm or have symbolic value as a firearm. Accordingly, no one would be allowed to appear in their movies with big muscles...... afterall, we can't have anyone thinking to themselves " wow, look at those big guns ". Other collateral symbols to be banned would be any product made by firms with names that might be construed to have an affirmation of firearms ( eg cameras made by Cannon ).

We would also have to censor any and all verbal content that might lead the viewer into some affirmation of firearms. Ergo, no scenes would be allowed in their films where people were having fun because someone might say to themselves , " Boy they look like they are having a blast ! ".

The more I think about it.... the more I like gun control !

12/27/2007

Gun Sales Point to Recession?

I've been watching developments in the economy and getting worried about what I see. The rapid devaluation of the dollar, massive bank losses due to the sub-prime mess, the run away federal debt, etc all point to problems brewing...... problems of a serious nature.

I never would have thought gun sales might be an indicator of this kind of problem. Here's an article that says exactly that.


On Second Thought, Annie, Don't Get Your Gun
Hunting shops are having a bum year. Uh-oh.
By Daniel Gross Posted Thursday, Dec. 20, 2007, Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive Co. LLC
http://www.slate.com/id/2180461/ http://www.slate.com/id/2180461?GT1=10733

This fall should have been an excellent time for companies that cater to well-heeled hunters and fishers. The farm-based economies of the Great Plains and Midwest are roaring. And the onset of the presidential campaign season, during which you often find city slickers posing as big-game hunters, usually provides a boost—for retailers and comedians alike. President Bush, in what now looks like foreshadowing, went out to shoot for doves during his 1994 gubernatorial campaign, and instead brought down a killdeer, which was protected by state law. John Kerry's duck hunting in the fall of 2004 failed to sway rural voters. More recently, tough guy Vice President Dick Cheney bagged a septuagenarian, and ex-Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney bragged about his long history of hunting varmints.

But this fall has been a terrible one for those in the business of making and selling rifles and shotguns. And for the dwindling core of optimists who believe the American consumer is doing just fine, the stock charts of companies like Cabela's, Gander Mountain, and Smith & Wesson should cause them to check their scopes.

Cabela's, which started as a catalog retailer in Nebraska in the 1960s, has enjoyed explosive growth: It now boasts 26 stores, with seven more to open soon. (As Cabela's grew into a huge phenomenon—Cabela's is to the rural well-off what REI is to blue-staters, or L.L. Bean to preppies—clueless New York-based editors occasionally dispatched writers like Manny Howard to decode the alien, rural culture of the company for their urban audiences.) But Cabela's has done poorly in recent months. Its third-quarter earnings, reported on Nov. 1, were decent, although the company reported disappointing margins. But as the geese began to migrate south, investors soured on the company's prospects. As this three-month chart shows, Cabela's has lost 40 percent of its value since September.

Like Cabela's, Gander Mountain is a Midwest-based (St. Paul, Minn.) purveyor of hunting and fishing gear that evolved from a catalog retailer into a large (115-store) chain. After a solid first half of the year, Gander Mountain has tumbled. In its third quarter, which ended Nov. 3, same-store sales plummeted 8.4 percent from 2006, and the company reported a loss.

The culprits, according to CEO Mark Baker: "warm weather across northern states, which affects our critical fall hunting seasons, and soft consumer demand across our store base." Baker also said the fourth quarter wasn't looking much better "in light of continued softness in consumer discretionary purchases." But what's good for geese has been bad for Gander Mountain. As this three-month chart shows, the company's stock has lost about 60 percent of its value this fall.

Smith & Wesson, the iconic gun manufacturer, is doing even worse. Its shares are down more than 70 percent in the past three months. Earlier this month, Smith & Wesson reported disappointing second-quarter results. While sales to law enforcement are doing well—after all, violent crime has been up for two straight years—the consumer channel is dead. CEO Michael Golden blamed "softness in the market for hunting rifles and shotguns driven by lower-than-expected consumer demand, an industry-wide buildup of preseason retail inventories, and unseasonably warm autumn weather, which compressed the fall hunting season." Golden also noted that consumers are buying fewer handguns. As a result, retailers stuck with too much inventory are slashing prices and reducing orders.

What gives? The unexpectedly warm weather may be playing a role, although the weather tends to play out in unexpected ways every year. And it's probably too soon to conclude that America's long romance with guns is waning.
Rather, the poor results for the legal gun runners provide yet another piece of evidence that the discretionary aspirational consumer is pooped. Despite what you might hear during Republican primary debates, very few people actually need a shotgun or a hunting weapon to get through the winter. Nowadays, most Americans buy fresh meat at stores like Kroger and rely on services like ADT to ward off hostile intruders. And well-made guns, which aren't cheap, last for several years. They don't need to be replaced every fall.

Cabela's and Gander Mountain stores are found in parts of the country where housing and job markets haven't been ravaged by sub-prime mortgages gone bad. And they're not in places where spending on discretionary goods is dependent on Wall Street bonuses. We've said it before, and we'll say it again: The sub-prime debacle is a symptom of the nation's economic challenges rather than a cause of them.

Slowing growth, stagnant incomes, and rising inflation are taking a toll on the ability and desire of American consumers—at all income levels below plutocrat—to spend. That's why these companies' gruesome stock charts look like ski slopes. And that's why the stock of Vail Resorts, the leading player in another expensive, purely discretionary leisure pursuit, is off 30 percent since October.

Daniel Gross is the Moneybox columnist for Slate and the business columnist for Newsweek. You can e-mail him at moneybox@slate.com. He is the author of Pop! Why Bubbles Are Great for the Economy.


12/21/2007

A reason to advocate gun control

I think there might be a good argument for some types of gun control. Specifically for those Hollywood activists who advocate gun control laws, I believe these people should specifically be restricted from having bodyguards that carry guns. In fact, lets just ban them from having bodyguards all together and let them rely on " virtual " protection.

Mark Towber

president@gs2ac.com

12/23/2007